I
love Pinterest...the fun little pin-board social photo-sharing website. Pinning
or posting almost anything that represents you such as recipes, home
decor, gardening and even wedding ideas. It's a great way to pin ideas and
things you spot on the web rather than keeping a never-ending list of what it
is and where it's found (not speaking by experience of course). I refuse to own
a Pinterest account.... but only because I would never get off it. This may
change as school comes to a close and there is a much-needed break from finals.
For now, however, it happens to be a "catch it when I can" sort of
deal.
Little
did I know there were so many legal issues attached to this cute little thing.
In fact Kristen Kowalski, photographer and lawyer, wrote a blog post that
turned viral on how she realized her infringing pins needed to be deleted. The
realization came on how this site where simple virtual scrapbooks of images
"pinned", could turn deadly. Ms. Kowalski is now part of Pinterest's
effort to push away these concerns and avoid the problem that shut down the
digital-music-sharing website, Napster, in 2001. This was to prevent the
trading of copyrighted music on that network although sites and other
alternatives have given room to do so.
Ben
Silbermann, Pinterest's co-founder and chief executive, really did want to know
what they could do to resolve these issues. He contacted the "tearfully"
disheartened photographer after reading her blog of removing her pins. Word
says that is currently being worked on, but for a million-dollar company, I'm
sure they can decide to do whatever they want until matters get worse.
Pinterest claims to repeat the rights of copyright holders and will, in fact,
offer guidelines and tips for best practices. Every Pinterest user agrees to
the terms and conditions read before signing up because of problems that might
arise in connected with anything pinned.
Pinterest
was founded in 2009 and attracted 17.8 million users in the month of February.
I'm sure Pinterest users are overly confused to hear that you can't pin
anything you don't own where the main purpose of the site is to say that you
can. The main difference between pinning someone else's material versus your
own, is that individual images have to first be upholder and then pinned to a
board previously created.
With
photographers getting ticked at the reproduction of their own imagines, Yahoo
Inc.'s Flickr added an opt-out code for users of the photo-sharing website. Any
user of images they don't want pinned can disable images and bar them from
being shared on Pinterest. A variety of companies are now selling rights to
their images via Getty Images. Some lawyers are still coming out saying that
the company needs to address the inconsistency of its legal fine print if there
is to place any blame. Little issues include whether the pictures pinned are
copyrighted photos that can be found easily on the Internet, which would
constitute the “fair use” where the images’ creators are credited, or if it can
be link back to the site of origin.